User talk:Ratio10to1

Welcome!

Hello, Ratio10to1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:57, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:12, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ratio10to1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

have not disrupted Wikipedia, have done no shill voting ... my accuser claims I added an article written by another account ( they have zero in common). I can't see my article but anyone there who has access, can see there is no similarity Ratio10to1 (talk) 23:23, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below after review of deleted article. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment on re-created article from blocked user

In the above, Ratio10to1 claims that there is "zero in common" and "no similarity" between the article he re-created and previous versions. This is false. There was lots of obvious, verbatim overlap. Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:30, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]