User talk:Rattler98

August 2018

Hello, Rattler98. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ElKevbo (talk) 15:43, 24 August 2018 (UT

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ElKevbo (talk) 02:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

ElKevbo I have left feedback both in the Talk section of the page in question as well as on your user page. The issue at hand is not one of COI but rather accuracy and adherence to the NPOV standard of "Assert facts, not opinions." I welcome your edit of the material in question as to remove the statements that are of opinion, and not fact. For example, if a medical examiner states that hazing was not a cause of death in a cited case, the citation should not make a claim that is contrary to the stated fact. I am not for the removal of the citation, but rather the accuracy in the statement. Rattler98 (talk) 23:49, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]