User talk:Rdblakely/sandbox

Peer Review

I checked all the links and they work for your citations and back up your claims

Forgiveness relates to the article apologies, which I am working on in the next step after an apology and plays a key role in mending relationships and having effective communication

The model of forgiveness is a great example in the process and steps to help a relationship improve

The main article itself is heavily based off forgiving in religion while your input is focused on relationships and the act of forgiving in relations. It does not quite flow well with the original article because of those differences. I think yours can be an article on its own, focusing on relationships and how to successfully communicate forgiveness.

Adding some more images would be nice as well to add the visual effect to your sections

The section on forgiveness interventions in children is underdeveloped and could include more information about the study or taken out. The title including children is ambiguous since the paragraph only focused on Chinese children when there are children from all parts of the world.

The most important thing to do in the article is to avoid subjective statements. An example of one written: “When two individuals are able to forgive each other it results in a long happy marriage.” Claiming forgiveness will lead to a happy marriage is highly dependent on the couple and how they perceive forgiveness because every relationship is different and it doesn’t mean their marriage will be long and happy.

Forgiveness is different for everyone and people can still remember the feelings they had before forgiving the other person so each individual will have a different response and it doesn’t always heal the relationship.

Many studies were used in the article and according to Wikipedia can be faulty and need multiple studies to back up just one to avoid any bias since they are more focused on a small group of people rather than the entire population.

Overall there’s substantive information written and some sections can be developed a bit more such as the criticisms to not only focus on physical health but in other aspects as well Paddy 19:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)