User talk:RebeccaForth
September 2023
[edit]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Brendon Urie, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. RF23 (talk) 08:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
October 2023
[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Brendon Urie, you may be blocked from editing. RF23 (talk) 16:36, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- I remove portions of page content because they're wrong and not from a valid source. They're written by internet trolls who try to cancel him by putting incorrect information on Wikipedia. RebeccaForth (talk) 17:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- I have reverted your edits, please familiarize yourself with how Wikipedia works. It is not censored, you do not get to determine what is a valid source. If you find a Reliable Source that counters these claims, it can be added to the article, however they will not be removed. RF23 (talk) 02:22, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- So if I'm understanding that correctly, then everyone who feels like it can just put ridiculous claims on a person's Wikipedia and no one can remove them unless they have a viable source that denies those claims?? RebeccaForth (talk) 05:05, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- I have reverted your edits, please familiarize yourself with how Wikipedia works. It is not censored, you do not get to determine what is a valid source. If you find a Reliable Source that counters these claims, it can be added to the article, however they will not be removed. RF23 (talk) 02:22, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- No you are not understanding correctly. Wikipedia is built on a foundation of verifiability. The section in Urie's article is sourced from multiple reliable sources. You may believe them not to be true or to be "ridiculous" or "from internet trolls trying to cancel him", but your opinion on these things does not matter.RF23 (talk) 05:15, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- No, no i get it but it's just frustrating because the people that made those claims actually said they were sorry because they lied about it, and that all of it never happened. Is there a way I can explain the whole situation to you, so you understand? RebeccaForth (talk) 05:18, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- No you are not understanding correctly. Wikipedia is built on a foundation of verifiability. The section in Urie's article is sourced from multiple reliable sources. You may believe them not to be true or to be "ridiculous" or "from internet trolls trying to cancel him", but your opinion on these things does not matter.RF23 (talk) 05:15, 6 October 2023 (UTC)