Welcome to my talkpage
- As usual, follow the talk page guidelines.
- Please be civil. Personal attacks will be immediately removed.
- If you start a discussion here, I will reply on this page.
- 1 Thanks
- 2 Barnstar for you.
- 3 In case you haven't already seen it...
- 4 Vandalism on Jim1138
- 5 Thanks.
- 6 Thanks again!
- 7 188.8.131.52
- 8 Userpage vandalism
- 9 WP:ROLLBACK
- 10 For you!
- 11 Pankaj Oswal
- 12 "Identified as unconstructive"?
- 13 Sirpur (Chhattisgarh)
- 14 Thanks
- 15 Dungarvan cheese-lover
- 16 A discussion that may be of interest to you
- 17 A beer for you!
- 18 Some falafel for you!
- 19 Regarding your recent reverts
- 20 A barnstar for you!
- 21 Fez Whatley page
- 22 That was quick..
- 23 A barnstar for you!
- 24 Alpha Phi
- 25 
- 26 Accidental blanking
- 27 Coccinellidae
- 28 Saban troll
- 29 Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
- 30 How be thee?
- 31 i accidently hit the rollback button on Aftermath of World War II
- 32 Deletion of Water Cycle - new definition as Waterway Cycle
- 33 Mistake
- 34 Bobby Sanabria the salsa its all Cuban music
- 35 Project in Progress
- 36 Donor Committee for Enterprise Development
- 37 WikiProject Immunology
- 38 Thanks
- 39 Human brain page alteration
- 40 Thanks for reverting vandalism
- 41 Thank you
- 42 Vandalism
- 43 July 2012 Study of authors of health-related Wikipedia pages
- 44 Latest Update in Response to Qnet
- 45 Did not make any edits
- 46 EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
- 47 FYI - User:Pimpsomanyhos
- 48 colby
- 49 freelancer.com
- 50 Diaoyu_Islands deletion looks an act of vandalism from you
- 51 A barnstar for you!
- 52 Thanks!
- 53 IP:184.108.40.206
- 54 MGM-52 Lance Edits regarding potential copyright issue
- 55 Krakow
- 56 THE CHANGER FOR NO REASON
- 57 Sorry I don't know how
- 58 Thanks for the rollback
- 59 Sock investigation
- 60 ArbCom elections are now open!
- 61 ArbCom elections are now open!
- 62 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
- 63 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Barnstar for you.
|The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar|
|For beating me to a bunch of reverts! Mrlittleirish 08:18, 21 December 2011 (UTC)|
- Thanks! Klilidiplomus | Talk 08:25, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
In case you haven't already seen it...
There's a thread at ANI about the vandal you've been reverting on User talk:220.127.116.11: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Need help with a BLP violator. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:35, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I did notice it, but I'm wondering why his talk page access is not disabled, as he is continuously abusing the user talk page. Klilidiplomus | Talk 07:38, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Vandalism on Jim1138
Hi Klilidiplomus. I've added the rollback flag per your request.19:01, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
|The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar|
|For beating me to multiple reverts today, and for beating me to restoring Lonicera japonica back to the last clean version. I salute you sir/madam! RA0808 talkcontribs 19:59, 25 January 2012 (UTC)|
- Thanks! I'm just getting used to Huggle, so I actually messed up once. :P ─═Klilidiplomus █ Talk═─ 20:41, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Thankyou so much for undoing some of the malicious edits 25 January. Due to increased media activity related to Pankaj Oswal I half expected some negative edits of the wiki page. Being somewhat new to wiki editing I doubt I could have successfully dealt with the editing onslaught yesterday. Again a big thankyou.A fair go (talk) 14:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
"Identified as unconstructive"?
Oops. I assumed that Theasg sap was replacing the same spammy link. Turns out he was not. Fortunately the admin who checked the AIV caught it. I removed the warnings (I hope that was OK with you) and apologized to Theasg sap. Jim1138 (talk) 16:09, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
A discussion that may be of interest to you
Hey there, Klildiplomus, there is a discussion that may interest you at Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Re-formatting/Discussion#CVU Guideline Proposal. As one of the hardest working Anti-vandals that I've run into, I'm sure the Project would love to hear your imput. Cheers! Achowat (talk) 15:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|Thank you for catching this. Much appreciated! EyeSerenetalk 17:57, 1 February 2012 (UTC)|
Some falafel for you!
|Fastest click on the Wiki! Jim1138 (talk) 08:51, 14 February 2012 (UTC)|
- Thanks! I think I'll put that comment on my userpage. Klilidiplomus+Talk 08:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Regarding your recent reverts
Forgive me for the lax approach but I'm not so much an editor as a reader - I thought maybe you'd like to attempt a temporary protection on the Titan page as a result of this post on the WoW forums. http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/4063007567 I'm sure they'll die down soon, if they haven't already, but you seem like a conscientious editor so I thought I'd give you a heads up. (Side note: I've never posted on a talk page, so my apologies if this is a jumbled mess.) 18.104.22.168 (talk) 06:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not an administrator and as such I cannot protect pages. Also, it appears there isn't enough disruptive activity to justify protection either. I will request protection on WP:RPP if it starts to escalate though. Klilidiplomus+Talk 06:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Yes, it does seem like I "jumped the gun" on suggesting it to you. Still, now you've shown me where I can make requests myself when I see a need, so at least for me this wasn't a waste of time. Thank you, and happy editing sir. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 07:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar|
|Your name pops up frequently at AIV. On the right side of the reports that is. I appreciate what you do, keep it up! Lynch7 16:25, 16 February 2012 (UTC)|
- Thanks! Klilidiplomus+Talk 18:45, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Fez Whatley page
Hello, I've noticed you rolled back many edits to the Fez Whatley page today. The edits of his announcement today on his radio show was that he was gay. Any chance someone can write this on the page without it being rolled back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by OneInfo (talk • contribs) 17:35, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- Well, it looked like the statement was entirely unsourced, and WP:BLP states that any contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be immediately removed. Klilidiplomus+Talk 17:42, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
That was quick..
A barnstar for you!
|The Minor barnstar|
|Thanks for fixing my typo on the Barnstar page. Pinetalk 02:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)|
- Thanks! I just happened upon it while doing recent changes patrol. Klilidiplomus+Talk 15:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
A specific personally added AIV report seems to get responded to much faster than a huggle report  took about 1 minute. Thanks for watching the fort! Good night. Jim1138 (talk) 08:08, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I don't think you reported 126.96.36.199 for vandalism; I ran into it by accident. Please report such serious cases immediately; they were able to screw up a lot of articles before I happened on them. You weren't the first editor to revert them today--I wish someone had reported them more quickly. BTW, you seem to be familiar with them; I semi-protected Charles Knight (filmmaker). Please let me know if other articles need protection. If things get out of hand, consider asking someone at ANI or AIV for a range block (I'm not comfortable making those). Thanks, Drmies (talk) 16:47, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- I will report them immediately the next time I see them. Klilidiplomus+Talk 17:03, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:41, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Message sent with Global message delivery.
How be thee?
sorry, i accidentally hit the rollback button on Aftermath of World War II and reverted a good edit. my apologies.
Deletion of Water Cycle - new definition as Waterway Cycle
Earlier this morning I sent a message to Cullen - who originally flagged my article for deletion. requesting my article be deleted according to Wikipedia procedures - therefore, my recent edit attempt to remove the article. Didn't realize Wiki's procedures no not allow an author to withdraw or delete their own material. Hmmm - interesting experience. Williamwaterway (talk) 16:04, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Bobby Sanabria the salsa its all Cuban music
Project in Progress
Hello, I am a student working on the candy page. My group revised the article and when I tried to post the new version I got an edit conflict. You can see the draft in User:RLHobbs/sandbox. I'm not trying to vandalize, only improve the article, and I'm not really sure how the edit conflict works. Can I get your insight? Thanks, RLHobbs (talk) 15:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Donor Committee for Enterprise Development
Hi. Thanks for reviewing my article. I am sorry to be a nuisance here. I have submitted the article on the DCED three times for review, but each time had it turned down due to copyright, most recently by yourself. I am grateful for the help here. I will now really look at the content I wrote and try and change it. However could I ask for more specific information on why you turned the page down? I really felt that the material was different enough to any other to not have any copyright issues. The structure of the page follows similiar other organisations. The content is laid out in a different manner to the organisation's website and with different wording. Some of it is the same, but this is as some of the wording in the sector is fixed (and used across all relevant wikipedia pages), such as private sector development in conflict affected environments or sustainable poverty reduction/economic development. Numerous references are made in the article. So Im not quite sure where Im going wrong. I imagine you are very busy, but any help would be really appreciated. Thanks very much Ashleyaak (talk) 11:23, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Pardon me. I have just seen (I believe) that your edit was undoing the previous vandalism (which I am grateful for), and that my page was turned down by someone else. I will contact that person with the same message. Thanks very much and sorry for bothering Ashleyaak (talk) 12:09, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
I see you have edited some of the pages within the scope of immunology. Please have a look at the proposal for a WikiProject Immunology WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Immunology and give your opinion (support or oppose). Thank you for your attention. 09:31, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
I wasn't sure exactly what was vandalism on that 2 Girls 1 Cup page... I edited out two paragraphs which were obviously vandalism, but I had no idea that nationalities and names (Fiorito/Mclean) were find-and-replaced as well. So thanks! :) --Nmatavka (talk) 17:13, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Human brain page alteration
Hi unsure as to why it was reverted? The source numbered  states the lengths as 176,000km and 149,000... If this was wrong, then the page on the "White Matter" will need changing too as the two articles conflict, source 5 in the White matter article is the same as source 12 in the Human Brain article yet the figures differ. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 17:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism
|The Userpage Shield|
|Awarded to editors who work to protect the userpages and talk pages of other editors from vandalism.
Thanks - M0rphzone (talk) 20:42, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! Just doing my duty as a recent changes patroller. Klilidiplomus+Talk 16:20, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
You appeared to have identified as vandalism an edit made through my ip address on the page djoser. I must inform you that I had never made the edit, and that such reckless expenditure of warnings appear as a deliberate effort to insult rather than to help. I apologize for any inconvenience that this post may cause. All edits that I have made are true and accurate, and I have never vandalized Wikipedia. Nor do I intend to do so.
My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address recently edited an article on Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please visit my Talk page or e-mail me on firstname.lastname@example.org. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance. Hydra Rain (talk) 00:17, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Latest Update in Response to Qnet
Your article on Qnet is outdated. Qnet compensation plan has changed. Please do further research. :) Your article sounds biased as it states a lot of solved controversies but have not stated what partnership or achievements Qnet has made. I look forward to the article update. Thx. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uuwen (talk • contribs) 20:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Did not make any edits
Regarding this article "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Restriction_Act_1901" which the accusation was referencing. Nothing on this page was edited by me or anyone who is using this external IP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 09:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 26 August 2012 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding
<!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:02, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
FYI - User:Pimpsomanyhos
Sockpuppet. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yummyanaljuices. JohnInDC (talk) 16:54, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
hey. I myself am one of the customers which are being defrauded. Also, I've given references to websites with similar customer feedback. What kind of reliable sources do you need? An article that the company has been closed for fraud or something? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Menkaur (talk • contribs) 18:21, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- A good source would be an article about the scam from a major news organization. The sources you have given in the article are self-published sources. These types of sites allow user-submitted content without any review, and are very unreliable. Also I did not find any verifiable information about this scam, all I saw was self-published content. Klilidiplomus+Talk 18:50, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Diaoyu_Islands deletion looks an act of vandalism from you
Klilidiplomus, why did you remove original discussion of Diaoyu_Island on 17 September 2012 . In its place placed a forward link to Senkaku_Islands? I would consider that an act of vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starrage (talk • contribs) 08:38, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|The Original Barnstar|
|Hey, I do believe that forum posts can be a valid source of references. Dongito (talk) 16:16, 1 October 2012 (UTC)|
Thanks for undoing the threat. I've complained about Kwort (talk) to the admin. I'm beginning to think Kwort and Kwotkuku (talk) are in fact the same person because both wrote abuse on my talk page. Any suggestions as to how to deal with these two?
~ Acsian88 (talk) 19:31, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you placed a notice on the above IP's talk page. They have again made the same change to the Havanese article; and have also altered List of dog breeds. I haven't reverted these as I feel it might need a further warning to be issued? It looks as if User:GB Fan also had to revert these earlier. Hope you can help. Sagaciousphil (talk) 08:37, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
MGM-52 Lance Edits regarding potential copyright issue
An Issue you are involved in, regarding the MGM-52 Lance Article is taking place on that Article's Talk Page. Several Users have repeatedly removed the section "Operators" with the assertion that it contains copyrighted material. Several Users, including myself have just reverted the edits on that Page. I am opening a discussion on that Article's Talk Page in the hopes that a consensus can be reached and the constant reverting can be ended. I am notifying all of the editors involved in the hopes that the problem can be discussed there and a satisfactory conclusion can be reached. King of Nothing (talk) 03:38, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
THE CHANGER FOR NO REASON
|YOU MADE BAD CHANGES Yale brain baby (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)|
Sorry I don't know how
Sorry about the changes I made. I signed in, I went away from the computer and some dick head did it I'm so sorry it won't happen again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrWadHarrison (talk • contribs) 10:01, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the rollback
Thanks for the completing the rollback at Toyota Crown - I didn't realise that I only did half the job :) 10:51, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Notifying you due to your prior investigation of related case.
Thank you for your time,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)