User talk:RicardoSignes/Pobox

This is beyond inaccurate.

There can't be more than 2 disputed lines in this short article. Why not fix it if you have an idea? lots of issues | leave me a message 01:40, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The disputed issues:

It's not Pobox, Inc. It's IC Group, Inc. The service is Pobox.
RFC is request for comments, not "request for change".
MX records are not a major part of Pobox's service (but spam filtering is).
The spam filtering doesn't use either a Bayesian or a challenge-response filter. What it does use isn't "unclear".
Pobox is not an ISP.

But, yeah, I will come back and fix it in a few days. I just wanted to make some sort of record of how many mistakes were made in such a short article.