User talk:Richard7777777

November 2013

Hello, Richard7777777. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Bitter Harvest (2015 film), you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. In addition, Wikipedia policy does not permit use of Wikipedia for promotion of any sort. The content you added to the article, full of such stuff as "The film is recieving [sic] unbelievable audience response and apprectaion [sic] in global write ups already", "BITTER HARVEST IS A REAL EPIC STYLE COME BACK COMPARABLE IN SCOPE LIKE SCHINDLERS LIST OR BIG ACTION WAR", and so on and so on, was totally unacceptable. Finally, if you choose to go on to write in a neutral way about a subject for which you do not have a conflict of interest, please don't "shout" at the readers by posting extensive text all in bold type, capitals, or both. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strange idea

"Censoring illegally what we can write regarding facts of my film"? Nobody is preventing you from writing whatever you like about your film, but the Wikimedia foundation is not obliged to accept it for publication, any more than a newspaper publisher or television channel is obliged to publish anything that anyone submits. You have a strange idea of what is "illegal". The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]