User talk:Rkingginri

Welcome!

Hello, Rkingginri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Uncertainty in the Empire of Routine does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TrangaBellam (talk) 07:54, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TrangaBellam, Thanks for the welcome! I am confused, though, why you believe that my edit violated the NPOV policy, when the existing article contained a variety of exaggerated claims and stated a number of criticisms of the book as fact. I summarized Dykstra's responses to the criticism in the same tone as the summaries of the criticism. If my edits violated the NPOV, then so does the earlier section of the article regarding the criticisms, and the entire article should be taken down. Rkingginri (talk) 23:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One add! The source of my edits was from Dykstra's published reply, just as the source of the previous section's descriptions was from the published critiques. I used direct quotations to show this. So there is an asymmetry, again, if my edits are considered a violation of NPOV, but not the previous section of the article. Rkingginri (talk) 23:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When four acclaimed historians denounce a work in the strongest of terms, the author's defense - even if it is mentioned in the article - will not have the final say. See WP:WEIGHT. TrangaBellam (talk) 06:31, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please stop edit-warring. TrangaBellam (talk) 06:31, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Rkingginri. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Uncertainty in the Empire of Routine, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. TrangaBellam (talk) 06:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are affiliated with Yale, the institution where Dykstra is a faculty. Please stop editing the article. TrangaBellam (talk) 06:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]