User talk:Robbak

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article British Halfpenny coin. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 05:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Expection Handling

In this case, Expection is correct (Expect + Exception). bot deny added for the time being. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robbak (talk • contribs) 05:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that Robbak. I've added an exception to my bot so it won't happen again. Cheers, CmdrObot (talk) 18:22, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Expection handling

The article Expection handling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a portmanteau neologism that doesn't assert notability. Couldn't verify notability in third-party resources. Google returns few relevant results. Entirely original research with the exception of an archive of obscure mailing list threads. Even if the term has been used in some reliable source before, it's probably too minor to be notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. dmyersturnbull ⇒ talk 06:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Softcoding for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Softcoding, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Softcoding until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]