User talk:Robertlasner

Ig Publishing

Please do not remove the {{coi}} tag from the Ig Publishing article. You have claimed "I am the editor of Ig Publishing, ..." and that is a conflict of interest. Jons63 (talk) 15:54, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}

Though I am the editor of Ig Publishing, all I did was put up information about my press. I don't understand why this would be considered "non-neutral" as the page is purely informative, and I provided links to everything I posted.

Well.. it looks quite a bit like advertising.. even if you dont mean to advertise, look at some other articles to see how it should be.. For example that excessive amount of links to the official homepage is regarded as advertising.. //Yzmo ^talk 18:52, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ig Publishing, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. The Helpful One ^(Review) 16:33, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]