Jump to content

User talk:Rockchalk717/Archives/2018/February

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Alex Smith

I understand where you're coming from with "reportedly." When I wrote that section I initially considered including "reportedly" but I figured there were enough sources reporting it as fact that it wasn't necessary (which is also why I listed 3 sources). But Bagumba added it later and I trust his judgement as an admin. Lizard (talk) 05:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

  • @Lizard the Wizard:I get your decision on that. I reverted and got to thinking about it, and was like you know it's not that bad of idea to put in there. Though there is maybe a .000001% chance either team backs out, it can still happen despite how unlikely it is.--Rockchalk717 05:41, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Realted incidence

I see that you have been having some interaction with Oldjacobite. It is interesting to note that his statement about what appears in the film is what can appear in the plot seems at best to be rather selective as he will say that then continue to revert based on something not being relevant or significant enough for his standards--whatever they may be. A review of Amistad's talk page will show this as after attempting to correct some errors there seem to be a repeated pattern from Saving Private Ryan and another article a group that steadfastly seem to work with what he was trying to achieve. After i took the matter with Amistad to the TeaHouse it was possible to at least change one erroneous statement that no one was willing to say from where was the source that then turned out to be the work of 3nreviews which of course are not bound to include in their articles what is only in the film. I even let stand what I knew was not absolute fact while the discussion was going on just so that at least somewhere along the way the matter could be justified as unsubtantiated and then changed. Although he can, if there is any derogatory remark on his talk page it is removed with the notation that is it irrelevant. He basically is exhibiting warring traits that are not part of WP policy and guidelines regarding being cooperative. Good luck with interactions. You can pretty well identifiy any statement that beginnings with the IP #2600 as being from me as my IP address assignment seem to change when I go onto the site.2605:E000:9143:7000:C4F4:8A9:74:80B4 (talk) 16:54, 20 February 2018 (UTC)