User talk:Royalistlane

{{unblock|My IP address is 195.188.50.200, and I cannot edit [[WP:WOW]] to add important new info. --[[User:Royalistlane|Royalistlane]] 14:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)}}

Block notice:

Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing.

You were blocked by Master Jay for the following reason (see our blocking policy): Vandalism Your IP address is 195.188.50.200.

You are not blocked from reading pages, only from editing them. If you were only intending to read a page and are seeing this message, you probably followed a red link. These are links to pages that do not exist, so they take users to an editing screen. You should have no problem if you follow only blue links.

If you would like to know when the block will expire, please search for your name or IP on the block list.

Appears that you are probably the same user as the user who got the IP blocked. No unblock. --pgk^(talk) 22:08, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, you were blocked for obvious and insulting vandalism. Another instance of this will result in a permenant block. DJ Clayworth 15:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Royalistlane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise not to vandalise any more. Oh, and release the autoblock.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have got to be kidding. This account has done nothing but vandalize from the beginning, and is likely a Willy on Wheels sockpuppet. You will not be unblocked, period. Mango juice^talk 13:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Royalistlane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Willy on Wheels, see my edit summaries. Either way, please unblock me! I promise not to vandalise any more, THIS IS GUARANTEED! Take the issue up on WP:ANI if you will

Decline reason:

You're kidding, right? Whether you have anything to do with WoW or not, your edit summaries do not exactly promise any good. --Joanne B 13:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Royalistlane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock this account, and discuss the issue on WP:AN if you're so freaked out about it, Joanne B.

Decline reason:

It's clear that your only purpose on Wikipedia is vandalism. -- Nataly a 14:11, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Royalistlane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Natalya, you think you're right... but you're wrong!! Take this to WP:RFI or WP:ANI if you have such a problem!!

Decline reason:

Give it up, this page is now protected... this is overkill --Tawker 14:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser ties EddieSegoura to "Exicornt Vandal" accounts

It is suspected that this user is the puppet master of one or more abusive sock puppets.
See block log and list of puppets
The use of abusive sockpuppets on Wikipedia is prohibited; use of sockpuppets
to evade bans results in the ban timer being reset.

This account is now banned permanently from this site. The page is closed and protected. FearÉIREANN\^(caint) 21:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]