User talk:Rulechecker3

Because, we can easily block you. We don't need RFCU now, it's obvious. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 23:24, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of multiple account to evade ablock. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

- Alison ☺ 23:26, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sock of Rulechecker (talk · contribs) and Rulechecker2 (talk · contribs)

Note: I agree, we all work for the same company. We are all puzzled to why we are blocked when we make a reasonable statement. In fact, YOU are trolling and being unreasonable if you say "We should waste RFCU's time and make them run unnecessary checks on socks who are already blocked." Why are you trolling and asking for the unreasonable?

The trouble with some wikipedians is that they say sock and get all bent out of shape. We are proposing the good and the obvious. We know how some people are resistant to suggestions, like those who insisted the earth was flat.

Wake up. Consider what we are saying. We are trying to streamline wikipedia. Look at AN/I. Half of the trouble is just garbage which can be solved with kindness and reason, not willy nilly block.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rulechecker3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am discussing a reasonable proposal. There are abusive socks. They have been blocked. I agree. Then there's a RFCU on the people who are already blocked indefinitely. This wastes the RFCU's time. It will show "Confirmed". Why am I blocked for this? In fact, if you look at the RFCU comments, you will find many instances of the checkuser saying just this....checkuser not needed. If you block me for pointing out the obvious, please immediately block all the checkuser for making the same comment.

Decline reason:

Blocked means "stop editing, please." – Luna Santin (talk) 23:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.