User talk:Rupert1904/Archives/2022/April
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Arthur
Can you link me to the discussion? Nehme1499 22:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_148#Notes_for_National_Cup_and_League_Cup_columns_in_stats_table
- Nehme1499 - please bring this up for discussion again before starting an edit war. This is currently against MOS to add those notes and you need consensus to add. Rupert1904 (talk) 19:24, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Rupert1904: I did... see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 150#Notes for National Cup and League Cup columns in stats table (pt.2)
- Only one person responded. That's not a new consensus. And you really started a new thread about it without pinging me @Nehme1499:? Did you do that so I wouldn't see this new discussion? Rupert1904 (talk) 19:32, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- That's really sneaky and not in good faith at all. Rupert1904 (talk) 19:35, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sneaky? Wtf. I would expect you to have WT:FOOTY under your watchlist. Also, please try to follow WP:BRD. You were bold, I reverted, feel free to open a discussion. Nehme1499 19:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Nehme1499: Of course it is. It seems to me like you purposefully didn't tag me in this new discussion so that I would miss it and not comment on it. I had started a previous discussion on WPF about it and tagged you so you could weigh in on the matter in good faith. Your opinion was not supported and there was not a consensus to include the notes that you add about national cups and league cups. Despite not getting the result you wanted, you continue to make these notes. It's against the MOS and I'm not being bold by reverted your edits. You are going against MOS and are trying to implement new changes that go against MOS and are not supported by other editors. The onus is on you not me as I've already brought this discussion up before and included you before the discussion was archived. I am trying to be friendly and assume good faith but I am very frustrated and annoyed at this behavior. Rupert1904 (talk) 19:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Feel free to bring my behaviour up to ANI if you have a problem with it. Nehme1499 19:43, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Nehme1499: Of course it is. It seems to me like you purposefully didn't tag me in this new discussion so that I would miss it and not comment on it. I had started a previous discussion on WPF about it and tagged you so you could weigh in on the matter in good faith. Your opinion was not supported and there was not a consensus to include the notes that you add about national cups and league cups. Despite not getting the result you wanted, you continue to make these notes. It's against the MOS and I'm not being bold by reverted your edits. You are going against MOS and are trying to implement new changes that go against MOS and are not supported by other editors. The onus is on you not me as I've already brought this discussion up before and included you before the discussion was archived. I am trying to be friendly and assume good faith but I am very frustrated and annoyed at this behavior. Rupert1904 (talk) 19:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sneaky? Wtf. I would expect you to have WT:FOOTY under your watchlist. Also, please try to follow WP:BRD. You were bold, I reverted, feel free to open a discussion. Nehme1499 19:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- That's really sneaky and not in good faith at all. Rupert1904 (talk) 19:35, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Only one person responded. That's not a new consensus. And you really started a new thread about it without pinging me @Nehme1499:? Did you do that so I wouldn't see this new discussion? Rupert1904 (talk) 19:32, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Rupert1904: I did... see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 150#Notes for National Cup and League Cup columns in stats table (pt.2)
- Nehme1499 - please bring this up for discussion again before starting an edit war. This is currently against MOS to add those notes and you need consensus to add. Rupert1904 (talk) 19:24, 31 January 2022 (UTC)