User talk:SDLEECY

Discussion started

For your information, I started a discussion about your antics, at WT:PHYSICS. ∞ Tim Shuba (talk) 04:00, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-standard cosmology

Please note that to merit inclusion in our article on non-standard cosmology, it will be necessary to demonstrate through evidence of coverage in third-party published reliable sources that such a proposed cosmology is seen as of significance. The article is not intended to be an exhaustive list of every published theory - such a list would be unmanageable and entirely lacking in encyclopaedic merit. If the material you have been adding has been referred to in the required sources please let us know through the article talk page. And if it hasn't, I suggest you stop adding this material to the article - edit-warring to include disputed content is contrary to Wikipedia policy, and should you continue, you may well find yourself blocked from editing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

VSL Cosmology

Addition is based on published articles, which are referenced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SDLEECY (talk • contribs) 22:40, 6 October 2014

Please discuss your editing concerns on talk:Non-standard cosmology rather than edit warring. Also, please sign your talk page posts - simply by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your text. Thanks, Vsmith (talk) 23:48, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning regarding edit-warring

Your recent editing history at Non-standard cosmology shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:46, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

VSL Cosmology

Addition is based on published articles, which are referenced. SDLEECY (talk) 03:40, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Acroterion (talk) 11:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]