User talk:Safwwefeasd

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Safwwefe (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Blocked

I have blocked this account indefinately for making a death threat at User:Newyorkbrad. Ryan Postlethwaite 11:47, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Safwwefeasd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I will not make vandalism and treats again. Unblock me, I will only make good edits and help Wikipedia. I was just angry at someone and made bad edits. And also I only made 2 bad edits. Shouldn't there be more warnings and I was just kidding that I will kill Newyorkbrad. You really think I really mean it.

Decline reason:

Two totally unacceptable edits, yes. – Steel 12:24, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

REVIEW MY REQUEST ADMINISTATORS. I HAVE ONLY MADE 2 BAD EDITS AND I WON'T MAKE IT AGAIN. Safwwefeasd 12:04, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please view User talk:Safwwefe‎, who is autoblocked due to this account being blocked. Ryan Postlethwaite 12:06, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who is Safwwefe. But I know I should be unblocked because I only made 2 wrong edits. Safwwefeasd 12:09, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Safwwefeasd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should get a lot more warnings for making vandalism. I only made 2 vandalisms. Unblock me, I will only make good edits and help Wikipedia. I was just angry at someone and made bad edits. And also I only made 2 bad edits. Shouldn't there be more warnings and I was just kidding that I will kill Newyorkbrad. I promise I will not make anymore vandalisms.Safwwefeasd 12:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have used that excuse one too many times. – Steel 12:38, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Safwwefeasd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize to you admins such as Yalma and Steel935. I have read all the policies and promise not to harm Wikipedia again. If I do in anyone way you admins can block me the first time I violate any policies. Do there are no risks even if I violate any policy It's jsut once. But I promise I won't, I read all the policies and guidelines and will be a productive editor especially to basketball edit because i'm a big NBA fan. Safwwefeasd 01:57, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

reason — Declined. No evidence that it will happen. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 03:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Safwwefeasd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It will happen. I promise. I apologize to you admins such as Yalma, Steel935, John Reaves and you Swatjester. I promise I will not cause disruption and will be a productive editor especially to basketball edit because I'm a big NBA fan. If I cause any disruption please block me the first time I do. Safwwefeasd 15:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your first edit was a death threat. You're done here — Dina 16:14, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do not repeatedly use {{unblock}} ~ Anthøny 16:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]