User talk:Salander86

Welcome!

Hello, Salander86, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! - Darwinek 13:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Three-way ties

Now it's irrelevant because Zenit won and is not tied anymore, but if there's more than two teams tied on points (and all have the same number of wins), the head-to-head games amongst all the teams that are tied count to determine the standings, not the head-to-head games split by pairs. So Zenit had 4 points from 2 head-to-head games, Dynamo 2 and Anzhi 1, and that would be the order in the standings.

Cheers.

Geregen2 (talk) 16:49, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was absolutely my fault. I missed the rules about three or more-way ties on the rfpl.org. I'll never forget again. Thank you very much.

Cheers.

Salander86 (talk) 17:28, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Damned Thing (Masters of Horror) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Damned Thing (Masters of Horror) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Damned Thing (Masters of Horror) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:09, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]