User talk:Salvadoor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Speedy deletion of Stunsets[edit]

A tag has been placed on Stunsets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Nuttah (talk) 08:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: The article was deleted because the band does currently not meet the notability guidelines for musical acts for inclusion on Wikipedia. The references that you included are self-published and do not meet the requirements of third-party sources. For the band to have an article on Wikipedia, they must either been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works that are independent of the band or the band has to have had a hit single (see the aforementioned notability guidelines for additional details). None of those criteria have been met in the article that was deleted. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:00, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]