User talk:Samuvk

Your submission at Articles for creation: best tennis players in history (September 26)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/best tennis players in history.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! LionMans Account (talk) 21:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The biggest problem with the article is it qualifies as Original Research, especially as synthesis. The article is attempting to declare a best player based on your own interpretation of statistics. The most relevant articles to look at are WP:SYN and WP:SYNNOT. I would consider an article based solely on number of tour victories (which can be proven), but it appears such an article exists Lists of tennis records and statistics. LionMans Account (talk) 03:50, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since there is not article where all the statistics are collected together, number of grand slams, number of masters, number of tour 500 and number of davis cups and number of gold metals, could you consider the article if I just remove the scoring, which is the part that can lead you to think that is base in my personal opinion and I just leave the facts of the number of titles? That would meet all the requirements you are mentioning.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.22.124.113 (talk) 14:29, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I won't promise anything, but you do have a better shot at acceptance then. I would only make sure there's no other articles that would be considered too close to that one. Off-hand though, I couldn't find one. LionMans Account (talk) 23:55, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/best tennis players in history

Hello Samuvk. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "best tennis players in history".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/best tennis players in history}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 07:03, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]