User talk:Sanaz 6482

Copy within

You did not identify the source of the material in your edit.

It appears to be Resistive random-access memory

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved. Additionally, while best practices are that this information should be included in the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked guideline does include instructions on how to add the attribution after the fact. Could you do that please?

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.S Philbrick(Talk) 11:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC)