User talk:Sanchny/Archive1

Evil Morning on MoMusu template

It's not uncommon for some bands/artists to have bootlegs or mash-up albums listed on their discographies and/or templates here on Wikipedia. This is no different. I've restored the link in the template - please don't touch it again.

--Cjmarsicano 19:56, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What insult?

Having looked at this initial post again, I couldn't understand where you got the idea that I dissed you. Then I looked back at when I reverted the edit to the template and apparently, when I typed "rv" the rest of that sentence (a stock comment often directed at anonymous vandals) came up and I didn't notice as I was doing that rv while multitasking at my job. Sorry about that, chief. -- Cjmarsicano 05:23, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Evil Morning and other mash-ups

Evil Morning is on the template because of how common/popular it is amongst MoMusu/H!P fans, even though it's not an official releaser - just like The Grey Album is with Jaz-Z (and The Beatles).

BTW, The other mash-ups could always be appeneded to the Evil Morning listing - and I think I'll do that.

Also BTW, unless an administrator has a problem with how I tend to "salute" vandals (face it, they deserve it), I'll keep "saluting" them.

- Apparently, you don't frequent any of the LJ communities or message boards that focus on Morning Musume and Hello! Project, because Evil Morning has been the most commonly sought remix on them.

Discussion closed. -- Cjmarsicano 18:31, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Quite frankly, I doubt you even have frequented such boards/communities. I highly recommend that you gain a little more experience on Wikipedia before you even try to order people with more Wiki experience around. In other words, I do not recognize your authority. -- Cjmarsicano 18:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do as I say, not as I do?

I would recommmend that you too, visit WP:EQ. -- Cjmarsicano 19:18, 8 December 2005 (UTC) I do not wish to discuss this matter any further unless you change your tone of voice. -- Cjmarsicano 19:27, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Last word on the subject

Evil Morning has been moved to its own line in smaller type and identified as an unofficial remix album on the template. This is the only compromise I am willing to make on this matter, as I have better things to do than get into flame wars with newbies. Thank you and goodnight. -- Cjmarsicano 23:01, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

sigh

In what I see as a hypocritical move, you have not assumed good faith yourself no matter what answer I give you regarding Evil Morning, especially given how much time you take looking up WP:EQ and other matters that I was long aware of before you came along.

To be blunt, I'm not about to let myself get pushed around by a newcomer. Put some more time into editing other articles for awhile and/or put some time into your user page and walk away from this matter for awhile, now that you've attempted to get admins involved, and maybe I'll take your suggestions a little more seriously. As for now, I do not wish to discuss this matter with you any further as no answer I give you will ever seem to satisfy you. We'll let the admins take it from there - if they can be bothered with such a petty issue. -- Cjmarsicano 23:22, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Screw it. It's off. Happy? Now go away or I'll put it back. -- Cjmarsicano 02:33, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Look, as I've said before, I don't really want to get deeply involved in this matter. It seems to me the both of you are being absurdly pedantic over a problem resolved a long time ago. Be the bigger person and walk away from the argument. So what if Cjmarsicano claimed he would revert the change? If he does do it, then bring up the problem. Otherwise, just ignore it. And so what if you think this guy is cyberstalking you? Don't feed the cyberstalker. Please, both of you, just grow up and forget this whole thing ever happened. As long as either of you do something to bring this up, the problem will never be resolved. Johnleemk | Talk 09:25, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

He says its satire, and considering some of George Carlin's stuff, I wouldn't be surprised if he was writing stuff in that vein. That would indicate it's probably not in bad faith, and anyway, as I said, be the bigger person. Johnleemk | Talk 14:58, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, George Carlin is not known for clean humour. He's even been the subject of court cases for swearing on his radio show. Just ignore the personal attacks if you feel they are personal attacks. Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should. This is much ado over nothing. Johnleemk | Talk 15:24, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. Go ahead and strike them out or remove them (but add a comment to the effect of "We worked it out by ourselves" so people don't get confused). Johnleemk | Talk 16:45, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation

I have filed my own mediation request. Until after it is acted upon, I do not wish to have any more direct contact with you at the present time. -- Cjmarsicano 19:37, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed.

Subject says it all. -- Cjmarsicano 16:44, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, not this again.

I was hoping in good faith that you would not remove the commented-out code (adding things is another matter - no beef there) - hence my decision to replace it. --Cjmarsicano 03:19, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That was so I wouldn't have to retyupe a shitload of code or go back to the last instance where it existed in the history. --Cjmarsicano 03:32, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]