User talk:Scepterstein Records

Welcome

Hello, Scepterstein Records, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. If you are looking for help, please do any of the following:

visit the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have
type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will answer your questions shortly
visit the directory of help pages

There are a lot of standards and policies here, but as long as you are editing in good faith, you are encouraged to be bold in updating pages. Here are a few links you might find useful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the current date. Also, it would be a huge help if you could explain each of your edits with an edit summary. Again, welcome! If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 04:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Scepterstein Records

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Scepterstein Records, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://sceptersteinrecords.com/main/index.php. As a copyright violation, Scepterstein Records appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Scepterstein Records has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Scepterstein Records and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Scepterstein Records with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Scepterstein Records.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Butseriouslyfolks 21:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for the article Eloise Laws, which was copied directly from http://www.eloiselaws.com/bio.htm . Please do not paste in articles from other websites, unless you can demonstrate that the material is released under a free license. Even then, Wikipedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, so material like this would have to be seriously rewritten. FreplySpang 23:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright and neutrality issues

Copyright: We need to verify that you are the copyright holder for the material you posted about Eloise Laws. The message above describes two ways that you can verify this. It may be a bit of a hassle, but it is necessary to protect the intellectual property of people like yourself.
Neutrality: It's not as black-and-white as "A bio simply states the history of a person, or in our case, the history of what this artist has done." The biography you posted is full of praise for Ms. Laws: "incomparable", "distinctive vocal expressions", "her exceptional versatility", etc. Those are all matters of opinion. (I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with them - I have no opinion about Eloise Laws.) Praise like this is perfectly appropriate on a website promoting Ms. Laws or Sceptrestein Records, but not in an encyclopedia. Please see our policy on neutral point of view for more details.
In any case, I deleted the article you posted because of the copyright issue, not because of the tone or the subject. Wikipedia policies are very clear on this. We cannot accept copyrighted text unless it is released under a free license (usually the GFDL) in one of the ways described above. Regards, FreplySpang 06:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of SRI International Entertainment

A tag has been placed on SRI International Entertainment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 18:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]