User talk:Sceptre/Archive 41: Difference between revisions
RandomXYZb (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::::::Sorry, you're right on Jbi - the warnings were tucked away deep inside all the standard image warning templates. Thanks for your time! <sub>[[User:Gb|GB]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:Gb|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Gb|C]]</sup> 20:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC) |
::::::Sorry, you're right on Jbi - the warnings were tucked away deep inside all the standard image warning templates. Thanks for your time! <sub>[[User:Gb|GB]]</sub><sup>[[User talk:Gb|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Gb|C]]</sup> 20:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
Hey, this is Timcanterbury616--I think you're mistaken that I was "vandalizing" the "The Megas" page. I changed the See also to More Information because now there are two See Also's. I am going to change it back, but please leave it be next time, and also I don't think the change I made qualifies as "vandalism". <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Timcanterbury616|Timcanterbury616]] ([[User talk:Timcanterbury616|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Timcanterbury616|contribs]]) 20:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Hey, this is Timcanterbury616--I think you're mistaken that I was "vandalizing" the "The Megas" page. I changed the See also to More Information because now there are two See Also's. I am going to change it back, but please leave it be next time, and also I don't think the change I made qualifies as "vandalism". <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Timcanterbury616|Timcanterbury616]] ([[User talk:Timcanterbury616|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Timcanterbury616|contribs]]) 20:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Well, better safe than sorry!!!! |
|||
== Some confusion? == |
== Some confusion? == |
Revision as of 20:35, 29 February 2008
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
— Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Chelseaadmin
Hi there - just a quickie. I think your report of User:Chelseaadmin was a little hasty (leaving aside the fact that they are now blocked for a username violation). The edit you linked to wasn't vandalism, and they had had no warnings in relation to vandalism (and only two edits overall). Thanks! GBT/C 20:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- No worries. Do I get to hit you with the flamingo? GBT/C 20:04, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- I may do yet, actually - what's with User:163.150.21.253? Looks like good faith additions, to me? GBT/C 20:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- I know - by you here. Which of their edits are supposed to be vandalism? I'm a Mac user, so not clear on how Huggle works - how automated is it? GBT/C 20:11, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, sorry to harp on, but I've now removed User: Jbi56. You're reporting them to WP:AIV, but I cannot see that any of the edits cited are vandalism. What's going on? GBT/C 20:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not really questioning your reverts, just the part about reports to AIV. I think you might want to consider not using Huggle - User:Jbi56, for example, actually has no warnings on their user talk page, as far as I can see. User:Chelseaadmin had, and has, none. Something's not quite right, I think...? Either it's reporting when it shouldn't, or you're reporting when you shouldn't. I have no idea which, but it could start to get a bit disruptive if we have to question the veracity of someone's reports to WP:AIV. Thanks! GBT/C 20:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, you're right on Jbi - the warnings were tucked away deep inside all the standard image warning templates. Thanks for your time! GBT/C 20:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not really questioning your reverts, just the part about reports to AIV. I think you might want to consider not using Huggle - User:Jbi56, for example, actually has no warnings on their user talk page, as far as I can see. User:Chelseaadmin had, and has, none. Something's not quite right, I think...? Either it's reporting when it shouldn't, or you're reporting when you shouldn't. I have no idea which, but it could start to get a bit disruptive if we have to question the veracity of someone's reports to WP:AIV. Thanks! GBT/C 20:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, sorry to harp on, but I've now removed User: Jbi56. You're reporting them to WP:AIV, but I cannot see that any of the edits cited are vandalism. What's going on? GBT/C 20:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- I know - by you here. Which of their edits are supposed to be vandalism? I'm a Mac user, so not clear on how Huggle works - how automated is it? GBT/C 20:11, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- I may do yet, actually - what's with User:163.150.21.253? Looks like good faith additions, to me? GBT/C 20:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey, this is Timcanterbury616--I think you're mistaken that I was "vandalizing" the "The Megas" page. I changed the See also to More Information because now there are two See Also's. I am going to change it back, but please leave it be next time, and also I don't think the change I made qualifies as "vandalism". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timcanterbury616 (talk • contribs) 20:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Well, better safe than sorry!!!!
Some confusion?
You've reverted 2 of my edits. One which was simply the addition of cite tags [1], while the other was removal or a previous vandalism and the addition of the word "internationally" [2]. Both are constructive edits, neither of which are vandalism. Your warnings about blocking me from editing are unfounded. As such, I am reverting your changes until proper reasoning is discuss. Thanks!AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 20:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Saw you note on my talk page. Thanks for catching that. AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 20:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)