User talk:Scheludko

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Scheludko! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 03:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgar[edit]

Hey man, thanks for your reply. You said something about Hunnic and Turkic elements being incorporated into Bulgar ethnogenesis. To me thats not very accurate as, if you saw the DNA sources/links, it says that modern Bulgarians are very close to Iranic/Persian people, so by that one can logically conclude that the Bulgars were then Iranic, etc etc - basically from the DNA research they didnt say anything about Turkic elements in the ethnogenesis, and I meant what the |majority| of the ethnic makeup of the Bulgars was (i.e: Iranic, as the DNA suggests, not mixtures) - I also meant the "origin" of the Bulgars if you will, what they were originally, before any possible mixtures (obviously very slight as the DNA evidence suggests). Ummmm, don't really know how to explain it better...Basically I dont support the "mixture" theory, and the DNA evidence said modern Bulgarians are very close to Persian peoples (so it means - the |majority| of the DNA of Bulgarians is Iranic, (with other part being Thracian, not Slavic!!!!!!!!!so Bulgars =Iranic). If Bulgars were mixed, then it would have showed something, definitely, on the DNA data that was collected this year - no mention of that, so the "mixture" theory, to me at least, is not very strong. I am very angry that all of this doesn't even get mentioned in the article, about late July early August I made a very fair edit (you can check it out - the edits with "new research 2010" not the ones without it), including all the information of the Iranic theory, and interestingly it stayed on for a while, before people like Finn Diesel showed up, who is clearly Turkish and has strong POV bias. It seems many people who are not even Bulgarian edit and watch the Bulgar page like mad!How on earth can they have a right to assert what the Bulgarians are, when they themselves are not Bulgarian - the Bulgars page is totally messed up, with POV everywhere, and avoidance of rules is crystal clear (WP:NPOV). Something big needs to be done. If you reply or comment, then do it here, as I dont have a page and my IP changes.

Kind Regards. 41.132.178.176 (talk) 19:36, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]