User talk:Schmikath

Hi Katherine: I'm the other editor of this article for INF1001. I thought your new section was an excellent contribution to this wiki. I wanted to get your opinion on the changes I made to the main content of MITA, and my section on Bill 416, 285. What do you think? Did you get a chance to see the article before it was changed? Thanks! Nikasho (talk) 13:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, wow where did you find all of those stats? I can bet you a lot of those view were from myself (if you looking at total page views). I think you did a really good job synthesizing the last instance of when MITA appeared as government bills C-50, c-51, c-52 and presenting the continued uncertain future of this bill with the current government. The only suggestion I have is perhaps to comment on if any additonal issues/concerns have been brought up with the newest versions of the MITA bill. Otherwise I think both our sections really complemented one another and help to give a full chronology of MITA. Nikasho (talk) 05:19, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

==Survey==

Hi Katherine!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 20:05, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]