User talk:Seagaze

Welcome!

Hello, Seagaze, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Amalthea^Talk 23:54, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Assessment computer-supported collaborative learning[edit]

A tag has been placed on Assessment computer-supported collaborative learning, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 22:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Thanks for your edits. Sorry it seems they were mistaken for edits that weren't trying to improve the encyclopedia. We get a lot of junk too. Please keep adding references and please work to add context so that the reader that doesn't know about the topic can get an idea of what is going on. That's one of the key difficulties of writing a good encyclopedia article vs writing for other formats. - Taxman ^Talk 23:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I second that! If you have questions, feel free to ask one of us on our talk pages or, as I said above, use the {{helpme}} tag. Cheers, Amalthea^Talk 23:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also added some comments and questions in the text for you in case you didn't see them. anything inside of comment markers  like these won't show up on the page, but you can see them when you edit it. It's generally better to remove those quickly though once they've been considered, so feel free. - Taxman ^Talk 00:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]