Jump to content

User talk:Sean deFaoite

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikigi insists that he is warning me about spamming, when I had in fact already done what he is advising me. I have explained to him that he advice is not relevant, and I removed the direct link myself.

This is the 3rd time that he has put the warning message back onto my page. I consider this harrasement. It also breaks the Wikipedia:3RR Three revert rule.


Wikipedia policy is "If a user removes a comment from their own talk page it should not be restored. By removing the comment the user has verified that they have read it. The comment is still in the page history, so it is not necessary to keep it visible just to show that the user received the message. It is also wrong to force them to keep it there as a sort of "Badge of Shame"".

If Wikigi continues this, I will be forced to complain that I am being harrassed.

"The "Three revert rule" ("3RR") is a bright line rule concerning blatant overuse of reverting, a common kind of edit war behavior. It states that a user who makes more than three revert actions (of any material) on any one page within a 24 hour period, etc.."
Look at your discussion page history before posting 3RR... - Wikigi | talk to me | 07:40, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]