User talk:Secret Service Fan

Blocked

Since it's obvious from editing patterns and from the use by IPs of images that were uploaded on Commons by this account that you're evading a block,you are indefinitely blocked. Acroterion (talk) 01:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You mean your guess justifies a block which amounts to censorship. Secret Service Fan (talk) 02:21, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Curious how can you justify why account created before an IP is blocked be blocked as well. It’s also interesting to see that a contributor’s discussion can be deleted from a talk page as off topic or a violation, while a scathing attempt to discredit said account using copy and pasted segments of the deleted contribution is allowed to stand. Very interesting - and really appears overly-defensive IMHO. Secret Service Fan (talk) 08:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-posted from article's talk page to increase chances of it being seen;

Presumably the comments were removed due to violations of the topic ban per WP:BANREVERT, since as pointed out further up the talk page "There is no reason why the time of productive editors should continue to be wasted here, by someone who has no intention of following Wikipedia policy or respecting the consensus of the talk page".

You are welcome to appeal the topic ban, see WP:UNBAN for details. However, I would recommend you don't since it will be a pointless exercise. Why? Well, TEN YEARS later, you still have a fixation on Greer and are editing in violation of your topic ban to edit war against consensus to add a conspiracy theory and/or criticism in violation of WP:V, WP:UNDUE, WP:NOR and WP:FRINGE. Any appeal under those circumstances will be doomed to failure, so I recommend you make more productive use of your time elsewhere. Grewsome47 (talk) 10:20, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are making an assumption. The ban is part of an ongoing, heavy handed effort to protect a specific narrative. Greer’s culpability is attributable to his own statements, as well as a number of credible researchers including Newcomb, Horne, Roberson, Palamara, and others. Greer. Why would a criminal investigator take down a physical description? Procedure when interviewing a suspect. Secret Service Fan (talk) 12:27, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greer’s own sworn testimony brings his credibility into question when compared to his actions recorded on film. When such an edit is made to the page, properly cited, it is removed because of the implication of these facts on the protected narrative. Secret Service Fan (talk) 12:32, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Exploring Greet further seems to be prohibited by administrators for some strange reason. There’s lots more documented analysis and criticism of his actions. Certainty he was in control of the car and failed to protect the president, as other agents did that day. Too many coincidences not to further expound upon on a factual, non-sensational way. If that sounds like conspiracy, perhaps that’s what it was. Secret Service Fan (talk) 12:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]