User talk:Secsamedy

WP:3RR[edit]

I noticed that you have repeatedly been trying to make an edit [1] that has been rejected three times by other editors. Please do not continue to make the same edit today, as it would be a violation of the WP:3RR rule. Please take your disagreement to the talk page if you wish to build agreement for your proposed change. Buddhipriya 06:15, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have entered in talk page seeking consensus, but talk page is wiped by an admin. Secsamedy 06:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Secsamedy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not at all trolling, seeked consensus in talk page Wikipedia talk:Harassment but that was wiped by the admin who blocked, which is highly "intolerant" behaviour. All edits are made in good faith. I think even this admin doesnt know the difference between wikipedia:blocking policy and wikipedia:banning policy. Im using this because im feared of being harassed as wikipedia:harassment is a guideline not a policy.

Decline reason:

A completely new account that starts making changes in project space and edit warring to keep those changes in smells funny. — ElinorD (talk) 08:03, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia:harassment is just a guideline, not policy. Hence all my edits will be reverted(wikistalked) and i have to put my effort all over again. What is the value for my time and effort? some of my edits will be reverted just because i did it. This can be done only if im a banned user which im not. At least put back my comments on talk page of Wikipedia talk:Harassment so that somebody will come on my side Secsamedy 08:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anybody there? And i did not edit war, but i took it to talk page. Secsamedy 08:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Use your main account, unless you're a banned user. If you are, you shouldn't be creating new accounts anyway. ElinorD (talk) 08:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for attending. If I use main account I will be wikistalked, and i will have to invest hours and days, you want me to put this heavy effort? Wikistalking of only a banned user is allowed and promoted, elsewhere wikistalking is harassment and im not a banned user. I ask you to place "harassment" and "privacy" at higher priority over "disruption to wikipedia" --> We are humans first and wikipedia is next. Secsamedy 08:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And sockpuppets are allowed in wikipedia, if you are aware. But they are not tolerated much. Using sockpuppet for good use is allowed as per official policy. Secsamedy 08:34, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]