User talk:Sejazer

Welcome!

Hello, Sejazer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 03:46, September 10, 2005 (UTC)

Hey Sejy, long time, no talk. How are things? How's Bloody Knuckles coming along? It's been two years and you're still working hard at it... can't wait to see all that you'll have completed, after so much work and dedication I expect it'll be amazing and really take Wikipedia by storm. Good luck in all your future edits, and hopefully they will all get the same expert treatment Bloody Knuckles did. --Jermdeeks 19:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bloody Knuckles

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Bloody Knuckles, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 13:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bloody Knuckles

Tough luck on the Bloody Knuckles page, homie. First it gets deleted because it was unreferenced and “Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day”, then, what do you know, Bloody knuckles gets written up (which is also unreferenced) because apparently despite Wikipedia not being a for things made up in school one day, it is a place for things made up by drunk guys while drinking one night. It's a subtle difference, but I'm sure Wikipedia has a huge page on the differences somewhere. Anywho, I hope that whole experience didn't sour you to the whole Wikipediaing experience and you keep editing pages. Peace out and Power to tha People! --Jermdeeks (talk) 21:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand the picture you left on my talk page, not that I mind, I'm just a little confused. --Jermdeeks (talk) 02:41, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Futhermore, your Bloody Knuckles has been recreated (since my last message about it, in January 2010). Salt in the wound, buddy, salt in the wound. --Jermdeeks (talk) 02:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aaaaaaand it's down again. You should bring it back up. I think the bloody knuckles game is notable enough to be on Wikipedia. I mean the drinking game Kings is up, hell, apparently the drinking game Zoom schwartz profigliano is notable enough to make Wikipedia, but bloody knuckles isn't? I call some bullllshit on that one, Sejazer. Look at how many unheard of hand games there are on Wikipedia! Get some citations, and go to work rebuilding the bloody knuckles page!! I believe in ya! --Jermdeeks (talk) 22:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see that Bloody Knuckles is back up! Amazed that you still get those alerts (look down below) when the page gets tagged for this or that. I mean, apparently it's still your page, but that's a bit of a stretch considering how many times it's been taken down, brought back, taken down, brought back... long story there. We should hold some kind of celebration in September 2015 for the 10 year anniversary of you creating the page (oh god, oh god, oh god–we are so old!), you'll probably have to be in town to vote in and around then (unless Harps decides to break his own law, again, and call an early election), so it could work out well. --Jermdeeks (talk) 07:34, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years, buddy. Ten years... --Jermdeeks (talk) 23:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bloody Knuckles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bloody Knuckles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloody Knuckles (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Zzaffuto118 (talk) 19:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bloody Knuckles

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bloody Knuckles, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zzaffuto118 (talk) 19:08, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]