Jump to content

User talk:Sethimothy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To any moderators it may concern: In the next 3 or so days you're going to see a lot of bizarre edits to my user profile. Do not be alarmed - these are individuals from various internet communities trying their hand at writing such a page. While you are encouraged to make changes you may feel based on your respected positions, the page itself should not be locked or otherwise protected from these individuals. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Hey, sorry about that. Honestly I didn't read your original text, I just saw a bunch of random BS that often finds itself on user's pages. But if you're ok with that I'll of course leave your page alone. Cheers. --Fang Aili 說嗎? 16:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. You won't be the first, or the last, to do their jobs while being unaware of the motive of the "vandalism" that is taking place. Sethimothy 17:01, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your questions

[edit]

Ah, the guy with the experimental userpage. Genghis "Rocking Awesome" Khan.. awesome. Well, about your questions.

  1. "Harmless but useless" templates. Hmm.. I don't know of any official depository. I've collected various templates and/or code from looking at random userpages over the past few months. I just copied what I liked.
  2. Unverified information--this is a bit more complex. I basically just use my discretion. If the information seems pretty plausible, then I usually leave it alone, especially if the editor seems to be experienced and has no record of vandalism, and/or I don't know enough about the subject to make a determination. If the information is a little "out there" but still plausible, I'll put a {{fact}} tag on it, which creates a little "citation needed" bit after the information in question. If the information just sounds ridiculous, and the editor has few or just vandal edits, then I'll usually delete it and leave a message with the editor asking about it. Regarding your edit ([1]), I probably would have added the {{fact}} tag--it seems plausible enough, given the rest of the article, and the editor in question made constructive edits elsewhere [2]. If you'd like to research it yourself, I believe all sexual predator information is available online.
  3. If the whole article lacks sources, {{unreferenced}} may be appropriate. (See Vincent Gallo as an example.)
  4. For more "official" templates, see templates for talk pages and Wikipedia:Template messages.

Let me know if you have any more questions! Happy editing. --Fang Aili 說嗎? 03:51, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

[edit]

Thank you for awarding me a barnstar! :) --Fang Aili 說嗎? 15:10, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two FACs I'd Like Help With

[edit]

Hey, I was just wondering if you wouldn't mind going to two FACs for article I have brought up to FA-quality, IMO, recently. These are Voyage: Inspired by Jules Verne and Agatha Christie: And Then There Were None. I'd really appreciate any criticisms or support that you could provide for these two feature article candidates. Thanks. Paaerduag 02:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please update your status with WP:VG

[edit]

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Sethimothy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Sethimothy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]