User talk:Shades2

Not interested in talking to people who are just out to silence debate.

July 2011

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 00:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are not the be all, and end all, on Wikipedia. Who made you the censor. Wikipedia is here to be edited, and nothing posted was not factual.

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Adam Spencer. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. LibStar (talk) 00:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your full reasoning for removing the previous edits, regarding Adam Spencer's radio interview. I notice you have reverted edits that are factual, can you explain why, or are you just ideologically driven and into vandalism of articles you don't agree with?

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and POV-pushing, as you did at Adam Spencer. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. CIreland (talk) 02:20, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of WP:AN/EW report

Hello Shades2,

This is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for Violation of the Edit warring policy at the Administrators' noticeboard.
If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the noticeboard. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them. ~ NekoBot (MeowTalk) 02:21, 7 July 2011 (UTC) (False positive? Report it!)[reply]