User talk:Shanghai32

March 2024

Hello, I'm CanonNi. I noticed that you recently removed content from Hongwu without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please achieve consensus on the talk page if you wish to change it to a redirect. Thank you. CanonNi (talk) 06:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Chongzhen, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Creffel (talk) 12:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Xingye (Zhu Hengjia), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Jtrrs0 (talk) 15:57, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"rv banned sock"

For the record, I am willing to stand by the banned sock's edits per WP:REVERTBAN: "This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a banned editor (changes that are obviously helpful, such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand) [...]" with the view that their contributions be allowed to stay on Wikipedia. _dk (talk) 07:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree here, actions against socks should be preventative, not punitive. Fantastic Mr. Fox (talk) 10:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]