User talk:Sheodred

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Stop.jpg This editor has agreed-to unblock restrictions in place
Restriction Enacted Expiry
you are to be listed as formally warned under the troubles restrictions (this will happen anyway) Jul 8, 2012 Indefinite
you are limited to editing on the article talkpages only on any Troubles-related articles, broadly construed, for a period of 3 months Jul 8, 2012 Oct 8, 2012
you are limited to 1RR on any other page on Wikipedia for 6 months Jul 8, 2012 Jan 8, 2013
you will not, under any circumstances, change "British" to "Irish" or vice versa, anywhere on Wikipedia Jul 8, 2012 Indefinite
you will always adhere to all 1RR restrictions on any article that is subject to it Jul 8, 2012 Indefinite
Any violation of the above will lead to a return to an indefinite block * *

If I were you, Sheodred...[edit]

I'd request page protection for your user space to stop the IP's hassling you. Someone's determined to keep messing with your pages. JonC 11:21, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Noted, thank you. Sheodred 12:27, 13 July 2012 (UTC)


Per WP:SIGLINK "Signatures must include at least one internal link to your user page, user talk page, or contributions page", please fix this asap (no links there, and the same applies to various other talk page posts). Thanks. 2 lines of K303 17:23, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Fixed. Sheodred (talk) 18:12, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2012[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Editing while logged out to engaged in disruptive personal attacks. Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sheodred. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety talk 23:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

"Disruptive Personal Attacks" Really now, I am blocked for this??? This is absolutely horrendous treatment, I am incredulous! Its clear a small percentage of the community wants to be rid of me, I do not think I will be requesting an unblock to such a heavy-handed response. I have had enough of consistently trying to prove myself to people here, all my work since I was given my chance after a block as a result of a long peronsal vendetta by a user who threatened, bullied and harassed me and continues all because they spend 12 hours a night contributing to article space whereas I do not. My work since unblocked all gone to waste for what? A "personal, disruptive, attack"?

My contributions here are numerous, I have contribute so much to Irish related cultural, geographical and urban topics; Puck Fair and Bishopstown are such examples along with political articles such as Non-belligerent, etc. But of course I am sure none of that matters to some of you, who cares about such drab, insignificant articles right?

And in response to MuZemike. Don't ever come on to my talk page again, do not even reply, you are an admin and all you have to offer is a taunt and you tagged me as sockpuppeteer on my userpage now unknown parties will wrongly consider me that, but that is just what you want isn't it, you were involved with me before and we clashed heads, and so you relished this opportunity. I did not sock as I broke no rules and I made no secret of that being me I merely did not log in when I voiced my strong opinion to the editor concerned, and I did not violate any of the conditions of my unblock if what I did is somehow construed as disruption and personal attacks then I am better off gone.

I'm sorry but no, just no, I can't take this anymore. Until the blocking admin acknowledges how impulsive and excessive your reaction was along with your poor judgement in relation to this case I will not be appealing my unblock as I'm fed up with all this and a lot of the people here. The community here is dying and now I will now indefinitely and probably forever take my place amongst those who have also withdrawn from this project on similar principles, there are too many short-sighted admins here and I can now understand MalleusFatuorum fustration completely. All there is here is nothing but needless stress and over-consumption of time, I'm done with it. I would like to thank you for allowing the same editor to again destroy everything I have worked hard at here for.

Go ahead and block my talk page Calil/Tiptoety/ etc to censor me for "soapboxing", you have a problem with me reverting edits here by people I have already told to stay off my page, that is fine, reverting my own talk page access will just prove everything I have said against you people. Thank you Wiki-admin cyber-bullies I hope you are satisfied now, another content contributor gone, editor-retention will not succeed with admins like this.

(Personal attack removed)

Adios muchachos you now have my permission to "ban" me and revert my talk page access.

PS. Sorry BWilkins and EdJohnston for letting you down, but..alas it was not meant to be. Sheodred (talk) 01:37, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Talk page editing revoked[edit]

Sheodred, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page. Any unblock requests should be directed to WP:UTRS, WP:BASC, or my email. Tiptoety talk 21:11, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)[edit]

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow

In this issue:

  • Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
  • Research: The most recent DR data
  • Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
  • Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
  • DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
  • Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
  • Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?
Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->

--The Olive Branch 19:29, 4 September 2012 (UTC)