User talk:Sioli777

January 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Locational astrology, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Please note that blogs are not considered to be reliable sources and that sources should be independent - we do not source a person's theories to their own work without secondary sources. Skyerise (talk) 12:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Skyrise. Thanks for your notification regarding my attempt to reestablish standards in the article: "Locational Astrology" that I had set in 2015 under the name Sioli7.

I understand that you set, quote and interprete rules for publication of information in wikipedia.

Regarding the question of scientific standards of information on "astrology" and "esoteric" I want to state my understanding of the general, abstract issue as the following:

- astrology is a systemical approach to interpretation

- there is no proven reality to results of interpretation

- all results from astrological interpretation are relative

- since astrology is and has always been corrupted for commercial purposes in 95 % of its publications through methods using mental, emotional, psychological manipulation astrological publications can not be trusted anyway.

- therefore I assume that the standards you attempt could od do make sense.

- You make me feel like I should not edit that article again.

Regarding your mentioning of the need for a 3rd source information on

Astrological Geomancy - Astrologische Geomantie I suggest the followng Astro-Wiki page - or is that nor reliable from your point of view:

https://www.astro.com/astrowiki/de/AstroGeomantie

Thanks for your help

Georg Stockhorst Sioli777 (talk) 14:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just read the linked page on what a reliable source is. In particular, we do not source to blogs. Books and journal article are preferred sources. Most astrology websites would not be considered reliable. And yes, if you don't know how to source a college paper, thesis, or disertation, then you should choose to educate yourself on sourcing and citation before you wade in. And you may not write about yourself or your own theories! See our conflict of interest rules below. Skyerise (talk) 22:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest management

Hello, Sioli777. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Locational astrology, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 22:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]