User talk:SirIsaacBrock/Archive 4

Anti-Semitic People category discussion[edit]

Just wanted to say that I stumbled upon the above category and have just voted to keep. I thought your comments in the voting category were quite good. Is that the only place where the subject of this category is being discussed? --Mantanmoreland 17:37, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. Interesting discussion. --Mantanmoreland 21:34, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

.38 Calibre[edit]

I note that you have once again removed the copyvio template from the .38 Calibre article and retained the copyrighted material. In light of that, I have reverted the page to the template and protected the page from further editing, until the issue is resolved. Please see the talk page for my explanation of why this is a copyvio and what needs to be done to resolve it. Kcordina ^Talk 09:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Big Bear[edit]

Please don't add Category:First Nations people to articles that are already filed in a subcategory such as Category:First Nations leaders or Category:First Nations writers. Wikipedia has a rule against duplicate categorization. Thanks. Bearcat 19:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios[edit]

Thank you for fixing the violations. I admit I was a bit overzellous on my second listing of Wandering Spirit (Aboriginal), and for that I apologize. Beyond that, things look fine now. - TexasAndroid 21:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I am male, not that there's really anything on my user page to indicate one way or another. :) - TexasAndroid 21:04, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad[edit]

Please do not add Category:Anti-Semitic people to the article. It is very controversial and there is a discussion about it on Talk:Mahmoud Ahmadinejad#Category:Anti-Semitic people. // Liftarn

Categorization of user pages[edit]

Thanks for removing categorization on my user page. user:liftarn should probably be noted too, he is the one who added it. -- Heptor _talk 12:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't notice you already gave him a warning on an unrelated incident. In case you didn't read the discussion I had with him on his talk page, you are not the only one who "wish". -- Heptor _talk 16:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accusations of editors being Anti-Semites[edit]

Greetings, It's been brought to my attention that you are spreading word in a personal attack fashion that those who've recieved a barnstar for their contributions on Islamic topics are anti-semites. I highly recommend that you 1. cease from making false accusations immediately and 2. remove all previous talk pages messages saying as much. If you do not follow this advice you will likely face being blocked as a Wikipedia editor. Sincerely, Scott Stevenson Netscott 19:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mr.Brock, in reference to your recent incivil post on Netscott's page, and the posts to which he refers above: personal attacks are not allowed on Wikipedia. It's that simple. Don't make them.Timothy Usher 22:06, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI report[edit]

Greetings, please be aware of this report concerning you. Netscott 00:37, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

I've blocked you for one week for disruption and personnal attacks in your recent allegations of anti-semitism against several editors. If you want to discuss it, I suggest you approach another admin who is more likely to be sympathetic to whatever case you can make. Tom Harrison ^Talk 00:40, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

YOU are what YOU are. No apologies will be given from me ! See YOU and your buds in a week! SirIsaacBrock 00:46, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on User:Jew's page[edit]

Highly inappropriate. I'm not an Anti-Semite. See WP:NPA. BhaiSaab ^talk 00:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CLOSE ME ACCOUNT NOW !!!! SirIsaacBrock 01:04, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your account cannot be closed. BhaiSaab ^talk 01:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think what he means is, block him indefinitely.Timothy Usher 01:10, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking comments[edit]

Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. --Stephane Charette 01:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]