User talk:Sir Kindle

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of ProfMozart (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Hesperian is not a God and therefor cannot judge

Sock of ProfMozart. Used to double-vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romano-German culture. Since used to evade ProfMozart's indefinite block. Hesperian 02:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is crazy. I clearly explained the situation on his talk page. Dont punish me for someone elses crimes. forget him, I have never done anything wrong here.--Sir Kindle 02:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the confirmed sock puppet, because it was simply not true.--Sir Kindle 02:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you remove it again, I shall protect this talk page. Hesperian 02:35, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you doing this. I havent done anything wrong, please dont bully me for this guys crimes. I thought I was doing the right thing when I was writing on his talk page--Sir Kindle 02:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know, how dare I place a block on you? Am I crazy, what is this bazaro world? You are going to have to go to the higher ups, and have this problem taken care of. This is ridiculous, just ridiculous!![1] Hesperian 02:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, well wasnt the one who said that. And there is no need to be mean. My track record here speaks for itself. I'm asking you please take the block off, and you will never have any problems with me, just like you never have.--Sir Kindle 02:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sir Kindle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have done nothing wrong, and this isn't fair. I am being punished because of someone else's errors

Decline reason:

No, you're blocked as a result of evading your previous block. — Shadow1 (talk) 13:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hesperian had no right to delete all my contributions. there was nothing wrong with any of them. He has gone way to far on just a wild guess of his. This is not right, and he should be somehow reprimanded for these actions. --Sir Kindle 03:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions suggested that you were using 2 accounts to try to circumvent the issues with ProfMozart. If you think we block people without evidence than you are wrong. Server log checks and other evidence are used to confirm sock puppetry before user's are blocked. You were given several chances at your ProfMozart account to stop this vandalism but you continued. Using a different account and claiming we are wrong does not excuse you. Please stop denying your sock puppetry, as you are not fooling anyone with this act. Xtreme racer 16:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thats fine, I'm just gonna wait till my block expires, its not big deal really. I know I'm not ProfMozart, and I have never vandalized here. I have only tryed to help, as my history shows. I do know however that I'm not gonna allow ProfMozart use this computer anymore.

Its bogus all my contribuations have been erased, but if that makes you feel cool, then please by all means feel cool, but I know thats not what wiki is about. I gave real insight, and tryed to help improve wiki, and my blocking is fradulent.--Sir Kindle 17:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You do realize that this is block is infinite and will never expire unless there is strong evidence proving innocence which isn't the case here because we can't go on a user's word. The block though obviously doesn't mean you can't read Wikipedia. As for you accusing Wikipedia administrators for being fraudulent I say they don't block without good reason or evidence, now your opinion is your opinion but I would suggest you read up on administrators and how they really aren't people who do things at random or without good reason, they have policies they have to follow before doing actions like blocking users and sock puppets and are only administrators because they have earned it through hard work not by committing violations of polices or committing "fraudulent" activities. Xtreme racer 18:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My I.P address' blocking is only untill august, when I am unblocked, I will create a new account, ban ProfMozart from my computer, and continue to contribute the way I have been doing since I came here.--Sir Kindle 19:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Take a tip take a tip take a tip tip from me, Ya'll aint Sh$%!! --Sir Kindle 06:08, 11 July 2007 (UTC) I erased the Sock puppet thing cause its a lie--Sir Kindle 06:08, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]