User talk:Slowrunner
Are you around?[edit]
Bhadanijee, aren't you seeing such gross injustice meted out to an editor of high potential [1]? How can you suffer such Adharma, when you stand here for peaceful and friendly environment? Slowrunner 12:49, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- I do not have any comment to offer as I am not aware of the issue and I do not have time to go deep into the issue. I also do not want to go deep. However, I may add that that Wikipedia works on consensus (unlike true encyclopedias) and it has a long way to cover to emerge as a real encyclopedia - it is a different matter that a number of wikiepdians think otherwise. As such, it is fine if you are able to participate in adding contents based on consensus (not necessarily based on real facts!), you will not face any problem. All the best! Regards. --Bhadani 14:13, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- After all, is this project going to seeds? I sense a shade of dejection in your note above. I specifically sought your intervention on the above issue for two reasons. Firstly it was some Indian admins who trolled and resorted to personal attacks on user:cindery with the result that she lost interest in contributing to the project. Secondly, unlike most of the Indian admins, you havee always shown a mature, levelheaded approach in the face of controversies. You are respected and your opinion counts here. I personally believe that you should put your foot down when some erring admins go on a disruptive course harming the project. Regards 59.91.253.209 14:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- You are right that there is a note of dejection in my words. I have reduced my commitments and involvement to the Project as better editors and still better administrators are there to decide consensus and build an encyclopedia by consensus and representative of agreed contents and not contents based on factual position. In this exercise, generally encyclopedic contents emerge and then are lost over a period of time! I do not want to intervene and involve myself in such issues which lead no where and is a wastage of efforts and energies. I am thankful to you for your message. Have a nice time here and enjoy the fun of building the sum total of human knowledge! --Bhadani 15:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- You are right that there is a note of dejection in my words. I have reduced my commitments and involvement to the Project as better editors and still better administrators are there to decide consensus and build an encyclopedia by consensus and representative of agreed contents and not contents based on factual position. In this exercise, generally encyclopedic contents emerge and then are lost over a period of time! I do not want to intervene and involve myself in such issues which lead no where and is a wastage of efforts and energies. I am thankful to you for your message. Have a nice time here and enjoy the fun of building the sum total of human knowledge! --Bhadani 15:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- BTW, I do not want my opinion to count here as it hardly matters. I have many real life projects to participate and express my creativity than loiter around here! I do some edits as it has become a habit. --Bhadani 16:13, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- After all, is this project going to seeds? I sense a shade of dejection in your note above. I specifically sought your intervention on the above issue for two reasons. Firstly it was some Indian admins who trolled and resorted to personal attacks on user:cindery with the result that she lost interest in contributing to the project. Secondly, unlike most of the Indian admins, you havee always shown a mature, levelheaded approach in the face of controversies. You are respected and your opinion counts here. I personally believe that you should put your foot down when some erring admins go on a disruptive course harming the project. Regards 59.91.253.209 14:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC)