User talk:Smithster1001

brew,

I disagree with the deletion of the Stink Records page.

The page is there to mark the beginning of the internets first internet based record label, and whilst not immediately significant in terms of third party information, this will soon be a talking point.

I have changed the username I use as requested, I have removed all links to anywhere except to the myspace, facebook pages of the label and the labels actual website and as such complied with previous requests, and now you are telling me that my page is going to be deleted for nothing.

I dont understand why EMI, Virgin Records etc has their page on the internet, but my record label cannot have a page on Wiki. Please could you tell me why?

Nick Smith

Smithster1001 (talk) 06:35, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In order for the Stink records article to survive it will have to show how Stink Records satisfies Wikipedia’s notability guideline for organizations and companies with reliable, third-party sources. Since it is (if I understand correctly) a new company, it probably does not have such news coverage yet—in which case (I am sorry to say) the article will be deleted until it does get such coverage.

EMI, Virgin Records, and similar record labels have articles because they satisfy the notability guidelines as verified by reliable, third-party sources. —teb728 t c 08:07, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]