User talk:Stabinator

--Stabinator 10:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flattbush[edit]

Someone seems to want to blank the article, my bot will auto revert it, so hopefully it won't be a problem in the future -- Tawker 08:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update, the ip in question is blocked -- Tawker 08:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it seems you've got the issue settled out, I've taken the challenge on the bot off, let me know if you have any problems -- Tawker 09:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flattbush[edit]

You're welcome. Just following policy against article blankins. Jude(talk,contribs) 09:03, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the history is largely unverifiable, unencyclopedic, and based on opinions. IMO nothing I deleted really belongs in an encyclopedia article about this group. If there are parts of the history that you feel are verifiable, neutral, encyclopedic, and relevant, perhaps something should go back in, but I didn't see anything there that fit that description. I do hope you noticed that I didn't not merely remove the history, but condensed it into the first two paragraphs of the article. JDoorj a m Talk 18:00, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No opinions...All factsStabinator 18:03, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]