User talk:Stangbat

User:Jon Maxant

Actually, it wasn't his user page at the time you tagged it. You tagged it at the same time I was moving it. When the user name is so close to the article name, and they don't have a user page, it's easier to move it than tag it for deletion, and it may well have been what he meant to do in the first place. Fan-1967 03:29, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. At first I thought he removed the AFD, then I saw it was a User Page. I thought I had messed up and quickly apologized. (Too quickly) --Stangbat

OK, Just how many people....

...are watching my Talk page for entertainment? Fan-1967 02:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He he. I think there are quite a few. But seriously, I've learned a lot from watching your contributions and how you work. Thanks for all the effort. Stangbat 02:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for your support in my recent RfA. I think valid criticisms were raised in areas that I need to work on, so I've withdrawn my name. I intend to work on addressing the concerns that were raised, and think I need to work contributing without allowing myself to become as stressed as I have been at times, which did result in some inappropriate behavior. Perhaps I may re-explore adminship at some point in the future, but it's a little early to consider that. Again, thank you. Fan-1967 21:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've done a lot of good for Wikipedia and I hope you continue. I think you are taking the criticism in the correct manner: not a personal attack but a chance to improve. FWIW, I still don't think that the admin tools in your hands would have been any problem. RCP is not easy and is aggravating. I did it for a little while and quickly realized that I could get too caught up in it and take it personally. Even the most even keeled person can get testy in the situations it puts you in. I don't think I could have maintained my civility as long and often as you did. Best of luck. Stangbat 21:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John J. Palmer

The article John J. Palmer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has been tagged for lack of notability for four years without having the situation addressed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 20:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]