Jump to content

User talk:Stpatel137/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Very well organized
  • Try to use more citations or have at least one for each section
  • Try to include more info from recent research studies
  • Could use more hyperlinks

(Jgill224) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgill224 (talkcontribs) 06:23, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]




  • I'm finding information on the mechanism. Don't neglect basic info about proliferation, etc. This has some good info: https://www.jscisociety.com/article.asp?issn=0974-5009;year=2020;volume=47;issue=1;spage=3;epage=7;aulast=Negi
  • I'd like to see a lot more terms linked to their wiki pages the first time they are used.
  • Needs citations for all subsections of diagnosis.
  • Some of this reads more like it's written for a patient than a general reader. Be careful of that.
  • Cite the epidemiology section.
  • Missing research section.
  • Your structure is good, and with a few exceptions, the article is well cited. There are some pieces that still need to be finished.

--Sweiner02 (talk) 03:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Some terms did not have its own wikipedia page, so instead, I put the meaning of the word in parentheses.

--Stpatel137 (talk) 05:05, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Great job including information in the abstract.
  • Since there may be limited information, is it possible to condense the mechanism/pathophysiology and pathogenesis sections into one? The pathophysiology section would be describing the biological process of a condition becoming a disease, but that could be explained in the mechanism.
  • For the prognosis section, are there any residual effects of having a COC? After having treatment, will they have full function of their jaw without difficulty? If so, it might be helpful to add that here.
  • For the causes section, is there any information on how odontogenic epithelial remnants develop or become trapped in the bones to develop the cyst? Does anything place someone at a higher risk of the remnants developing?

--ChiDoc0517 (talk) 22:57, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I explained the odontogenic epithelial remnants in the Mechanism/Pathophysio section.

--Stpatel137 (talk) 03:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • The introduction is well written, and has lots of information on the disease. This is the most viewed section and would most likely help viewers understand more about the disease
  • With the epidemiology, any information about how it was found and where it was found might be beneficial to the general public and would seem more efficient
  • For the diagnosis, maybe just grouping the scans together and linking the scans would help users understand the exams that are needed
  • The causes of the disease, maybe adding a little more information to that section since no mechanism or pathogenesis has little to know the information in that section

Haneefav1 (talk) 03:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I did not group the scans together because they are two different types of imaging procedures for diagnostics of the diease, however, I did link the scans.
  • As for the causes, I was able to find the mechanism and added the mechanism section.

--Stpatel137 (talk) 03:59, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]