User talk:Sulaiman the magnificent
It's not a matter of copyright violation. Rather, your contribution to the article falls foul of the policy aginst original research and synthesis.
A reference needs to directly support the claim made in the article. So when you say that "Games of chance, even when the risk of losing is small, are not acceptable", or "Investing in the market is generally acceptable", you need a third-party reference which supports the claim made. (Your references only support tangential claims like "Gambling may be addictive".)
Likewise, using the Koran as a reference is okay when the article directly quotes from it; but it is not okay to add your own interpretation of the text of the Koran.
The article is based on text written, perhaps by yourself, at Stack Exchange and WordPress. I am afraid blogs and the like are generally not reliable sources; anybody can post anything on the Internet.
Oh yes, and Wikipedia does not add honorifics like "Peace be upon him" after the mentions of Muhammad and other religious figures (except in direct quotes). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:27, 12 April 2015 (UTC)