User talk:Suparnoeb

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Koolabhieb (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Amalthea 15:09, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm posting the reply to your E-Mail here as well:

I blocked your account from editing since it is obvious that you are the same person who previously edited using the Koolabhieb account, and were blocked from editing indefinitely one week ago due to your repeated tries since the beginning of the year to add promotional material to a Wikipedia article, material that is additionally in violation of the copyright of its original author, and your complete failure to discuss your changes and the problems with your edits on either an article talk page or your user talk page despite several warnings. Evading such a block by creation of new accounts is, obviously, against Wikipedia policy, so your additional accounts were blocked as well.

That being said, no blocks on Wikipedia are infinite. You are very welcome to return to the talk page of your original account, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Koolabhieb>, and appeal your block. Details about this can be found at <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:APPEAL>, which you should read first. I can tell you right away that you must show an eagerness to discuss any problems from now on, instead of stubbornly repeating your changes or edit warring over them (<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:Edit_warring>).

Also, please notice that any further block evasion will come across very poorly. You should have realized now that the only way to keep your changes in the article is by convincing other editors that those changes are an improvement to the encyclopedic article. If you are unblocked, I would strongly urge you to discuss changes to that article at the talk page first.

I have your talk page on my watchlist, so if you have any further questions, I'd prefer discussing them there.

Amalthea 20:32, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]