User talk:Sviemeister

Tang sources

Thanks for finding sources for some of the statements in the Tang article. Do you know what statements each source backs up? The sources should be inlined using the <ref>URL</ref> tags, or introduced in the references section (see: WP:CITE). Adding them in the external links confuses their status as sources (though your edit summary is helpful in that regard). --GargoyleMT 16:24, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You said "Do you know what statements each source backs up?" I am not sure what you mean exactly. The first reference is from NASA itself and represents historical proof that Tang was used in the Gemini progeam. I sent them an email, to verify some facts and they did not respond. The second was the origin of the quite.

Steven Viemeister - rtisbute 07:21, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You added the sources to the "External link" section, but called them "sources" in your edit summary. If it's a source for a particular statement, use the tag <ref>{{cite web |title=Title |url=http://www.example.com}}</ref> to use them as a source. I've made the changes for you, see this diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tang_%28drink%29&diff=132917943&oldid=132537567 External links and sources two different things, I wanted to clear up any mixed messages. I'd be happy to help in any way I can, especially if I'm being confusing. --GargoyleMT 12:58, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clear hat

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Clear hat, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. NeilN 18:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is the name of the press source you are referring to? --NeilN 19:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This was a stub added as a logical description of a type of security professional with an academic background.

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]