User talk:TBloemink/Archive1

Help with Afd

Hello. I would simply need help with actually creating the correct templates. I have done as it says at the Afd page, and it came out as a mess. Thanks in advance for any helpSeeker of the Torch (talk) 14:42, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I take it everything is correct now. Again thanks. Seeker of the Torch (talk) 15:20, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why Reverted the edits?

You have reverted my edits to page Talk:Kannada saying that they were not constructive. Why?. Have you seen the first section which says classical status given to kannada should be withdrawn. This section contain things which are original research and offensive. That is why I blanked it. Classical status is given by Government of India and if some one can abject to it stating his views it is Original research rather than anything. In the other sections I was answering to his questions. So why did you delete it? Please see before doing this. Thanks.117.97.69.32 (talk) 07:57, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted because it looked like you changed an signature. If I'm wrong, then accept my apologies - TBloemink (talk) 08:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you mistake

I delete page, because is personal message to my IP. Message is say that Bot make false positive about my edit. Message is say that if false positive, I must to report, remove message, then write again what I want. I do what message say, now you are saying I must not. Sorry if I am wrong but I think you mistake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.75.152.135 (talk) 14:59, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for any inconvenience caused. I thought you were blanking your talk page - User:TBloemink/Signature 15:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Note: There was another message by User:Hoo man, so you deleted things you shouldn't have deleted - User:TBloemink/Signature 15:06, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he think I vandal. I explane to him that I not vandal, and he understand. I think it is good to put informations in article, but perhaps Wikipedia doesn't need my help only my money. Anyway, thank you for explane and Good New Year for you and people you love! 85.75.152.135 (talk) 15:18, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You too :) - User:TBloemink/Signature 15:21, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Rollback and reviewer granted

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:07, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have also given you reviewer rights; see WP:REVIEWER and Help:Pending changes for more information. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 19:07, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! User:TBloemink/Signature 19:08, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]