User talk:TGB13

Welcome!

Hello, TGB13, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Louth Old Boys J.F.C., may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:18, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Louth Old Boys J.F.C.

The article Louth Old Boys J.F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Youth football club which seems to compete only in the Lincolnshire Co-op Mid Lincs Youth League (Boys). This is not a notable level of football

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:18, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dayle Southwell

The article Dayle Southwell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:Bio, player must play in a full time professional league before he is eligable to for an article page. This player is a youth team player and hasn't even made the first team yet.l

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Footballgy (talk) 16:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dayle Southwell

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Dayle Southwell. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bishop Grosseteste University may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:14, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Brock 009. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryan Olowofela

The article Ryan Olowofela has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The sources were all PRs and still can't find a reliable source. Fails GNG and BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 16:38, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not all of the sources are press releases, there are reliable sources from both his club and country. The press releases were announcements of his involvement in the national team. Doesn't fail GNG as he has represented his country. Doesn't fail BIO as there is at least one reliable source. TGB13 (talk) 16:44, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can provide further sources such as the England Sevens squad page: http://www.englandrugby.com/england/england-sevens/squads/ and the tournament's website where it mentions each of his appearances http://www.rugbyeurope.eu/search/node/olowofela If they help to provide further support for the retention of the article? TGB13 (talk) 16:56, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your participation in the RfC

Thanks for participating in the RfC. I'm also relatively new to serious editing on Wikipedia, and one of the hardest things I've had to learn is to disengage with particularly difficult editors. There's a point at which it becomes obvious that the other editor is not approaching the conversation in a collaborative spirit (usually around the point they start commenting on you personally), and that's the point at which engaging with these editors takes up an excessive amount of time, effort and mental energy while almost guaranteeing nothing fruitful will come of it. That's usually the point at which it's best to disengage and seek dispute resolution when necessary (such as what I've done with the request for comment). All the best, Cjhard (talk) 22:24, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. Even the most 'experienced' editors can be quite volatile, and I've received support from others when disputing an edit, which has helped greatly. I'm therefore always happy to contribute to any RFC that I understand enough. TGB13 (talk) 22:37, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Lewington

Hi TGB, my understanding is that "league appearances only" is a football thing and that for rugby its any and all official first team appearances. That's what I've always done, I never understood why football chose to be league games only but barely edit any football pages so never really cared much.

@Skeene88 Ah okay, I didn't know, I just assumed Wikipedia had some consensus. I prefer the rugby way though, thank you for informing me! TGB13 (talk) 19:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TGB13. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TGB13. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]