User talk:TJBeekman

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Narcotics Anonymous appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Coffeepusher (talk) 20:27, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Narcotics_Anonymous. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. WookieInHeat (talk) 21:22, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Narcotics Anonymous. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WookieInHeat (talk) 23:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Narcotics Anonymous. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. WookieInHeat (talk) 01:29, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Narcotics Anonymous. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. please bring this to the talk page if you want it included, but it appears to be Original research lacking reliable sources and a neutral point of view Coffeepusher (talk) 04:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, TJBeekman. You have new messages at WookieInHeat's talk page.
Message added 15:13, 26 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, TJBeekman. You have new messages at Coffeepusher's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, TJBeekman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Coffeepusher (talk) 15:26, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]