User talk:Tasase5

Howdy

I, mostly, edit/edited on Turkish Vikipedi. But I came here back in 2014 but unfortunately my English level was below poor so I couldn't contribute to Wikipedia. I improved my English thanks to translating a few articles from English Wikipedia to Turkish Vikipedi.

Warning

I suggest you read Wiki guidelines and desist from edit-warring. Take a look at WP:ONUS and WP:CONSENSUS. For your information, Kurds are not "native Caucasian" but an Iranian people and the people of Gorgan are a mix of Iranian peoples and Tukmen. Also, the source you're trying to add is from 2006, not 2017. Stop misrepresenting what the sources say or you'll be reported.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:22, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikavian:Please drop the passive-aggressive attitude and try to be more peaceful. I too sometimes get angry online but I try my best to not be angry. If I offended you before I apologize. Now here we can start a new discussion: I think you're not reading carefully. The only study I added was the 2006 study. But I'm talking about the 2017 study on the talk page, which was added by someone else but it proves the point of Azerbaijanis having Turkic-like heritage. The 2017 study I added says "Kurds, who have shown a closer Mediterranean/Caucasus HLA profile" therefore I said "Native Caucasian heritage", since Azerbaijan was inhabited by Caucasian peoples like Udis, Armenians and Talysh etc. The 2006 study I added almost 1 month ago has little to do with our discussione except for you claiming it's "dodgy". But it was quoted by an actual, peer reviewed and somewhat popular study back in 2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4904778/ (references part, 3rd article)

Also regarding Gorgan Turkmens, the study clearly says they're Central Asian. I don't know what's your point here. Are you saying Gorgan Turkmens are Iranic? The study says they are Central Asian specifically.

For the record, I'm not claiming Azerbaijanis are pure Turkics. I'm arguing they're rather a mix as I read from studies and personal results. The very page I edited on also states that they're a mix. Tasase5 (talk) 12:30, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not offended and as far as i can see, the one who is edit-warring for including some content without consensus s you, not me. What you're doing, is against WP:SYNTH, meaning that you're interpreting the sources, that is not allowed on Wikipedia. Also, let's keep the discussion centralized, thus on the articles' talk pages.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:40, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Before I end the discussion on my talk page, I'm not interpreting any source. I included the very sentence from the study. Which is not interpreting but rather quoting. Which is allowed on Wikipedia. Tasase5 (talk) 13:00, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]