User talk:Tepido

Sock edits can be reverted on sight

As a sock of Koov, I can revert anything you post, and any edit you make. The block will be coming, so I suggest you give up the game. Cheers. Doc talk 22:02, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Give it up Doc9871

You still couldn't prove to me that I am the banned user Koov. So you give up your lies and leave me alone. You are the liar here. Cheers give it up Englishman. I am not the user:koov. I don't even know who that person is. User:Tepido Tepido 18:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

What new user watchlists the talkpage of the user that filed the last SPI? None. You are Koov, and the other editors will see that as easily as I did. Sad. Doc talk 22:14, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

I am not the banned user:Koov Doc9871. You gave no evidence thus far. You continue to attack me because you are a very rude man. I believe that the real reason I had watchlisted the talkpage because you had no right to claim that I am Koov. You decided to attack me based on no evidence. Sad! No you are pathetic Doc9871. Just leave me alone. User:Tepido talk 18:22, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

I am not Koov

I am not a quack of Koov or even a sockpuppet. I tell all of the administrators that if they found out about me. They will know that I am not Koov. I don't know that person. Where is the evidence that Doc9871 has shown that I am Koov. If any administrator has any evidence talk on this user page and we can discuss it. Compare my edits with that of Koov. I only started today. I wanted to see how Wikipedia editing works out and this user compares me to a user named Koov. Just please tell me who he or she is and compare my edits. You will see I have nothing at all with koov. User:Tepido talk 18:42, 2 July 2013 (UTC)